The interview was published in a shortened way in the daily Sme
on the 21st August, 2000. Theinterviewer was Alexander Balogh.
It seemed the audience would not wait to see you this summer. What decided that you have begun the eleventh season according to the tradition of your holiday performances? I myself don´t exactly know. Maybe I missed the old times when we tried to play with great enthusiasm also at times when it was not usual. And when I realized we were opening the eleventh season I thought it also had a certain value. However, it only may be a small sentimentality. In the August programme there are two stagings plus their English versions. After last performances of three plays in the past season you still have eight titles in your repertoire. That was so till the middle of June, when Ingrid Hrubanièová let us know she wouldn’t like to play any more. And so, unexpectedly, Impasse, Eo Ipso, Monodramas, Faces, and Hetstato disappeared from our repertoire. Moreover, as Zuzana Piussi is soon to bear her second child, we cannot perform the play The Bottom, either. We only can present From Afar, and Sami Meri Vari. Does that mean the other stagings are lost for ever? Do you not prepare their farewell performances, at least? I will miss the plays, although... if each of them appeared on the stage
three times in the season, that would be enough (our small theatre might
be filled for the most part).
Some time ago you said, everything essential in the theatre’s existence happened in the first year, when the core of the ensemble was established. You accepted departures - many a time connected with existential problems - with a poker face. Anyway, the ensemble reduced to minimum at the end of the season. Do you still insist upon your opinion? I probably do. The rise of the ensemble was a coincidence of thousands chances, and such things usually do not come again. It’s a paradox that happened after significant awards at Divadelná Nitra 1998, and then after last year’s first night of the play Hetstato which was accepted by both the audience and critics very favourably. Is it a coincidence, or culmination of different artistic ways? Maybe both. And surely also the logic of the development. After some time, it si natural some people leave. It is necessary to leave the events their natural course. Of course, a team composed of completely strange indivuduals, can be patched by force but, in my opinion, it is unnatural. Due to the fact, the state theatre ensembles are subsidized with money of taxpayers, many of them exist in this way. It is completely immoral, in fact. You and Lucia Piussi then introduced your common play, From Afar, which you learned in English, too. It is soon to evaluate that step, but what was the reason to do so? What do you expect of it? To tell you the truth, I have decided to emmigrate. I have not succeeded so far. Do you plan to show any new people or former members? Perhaps we will save the play Monodramas. Instead of Hrubanièová’s fragment we are preparing a new one with Erika Lásková, its working title is Portraits of Passengers. If we succeed, after the five-year break filled with the intensive office work, Erika will experience the first night’s feeling again. Unfortunately, without Jozef Chmelo’s fragment The Pamouks, because he also informed us he wouldn’t go on with us. Of course, that everything can be done after Zuza Piussi recovers from her second maternity. For years, you have been the leader in the struggle of independent theatres for life. But your idea to abolish state theatres is also very well known. Some time ago, you published the tract entitled Where Does Our Misery Lie? in press which you seriously call it’s your life-time work. What about Stoka’s present financial situation? The beginning of the year looked interesting and with good prospects.
After the generous financial injection from the Ministry of Culture of
Slovak Republic in 1999 (for all non-state theatres), there arose
hope of a better season. At the Ministry of Culture a more elaborated system
of support was being worked out, they intensively spoke about a subsidy,
although a small one, for the operational activity of independent theatres
too, so we filled in very complicated data. At the same time, there emerged
a chance to cooperate with a private television which intended to make
four or five programmes monthly in our theatre. It looked promising. However,
the Ministry probably changed its mind later, because the subsidies were
minimalized, and the private TV got to troubles and still ows us some money.
After this record, do you not have the feeling you pay, despite indisputable artistic successes, an excessive tax for your long-wished-for independence? Absolutely. It is also the source of my total disgust which takes my joy of life and of creation. The horrid awareness of the eternal subject who must turn his or her freedom and future over to somebody else is completely unmotivating. Of course, it is not only our problem. It is the situation of the whole society in which the individual’s freedom is driven back to the most remote corner. It is quite obvious it is the society that can ensure the country’s prosperity and a respectable status of her citizens. Under these conditions, it can never happen in our country. Well, what about the next season? We shall probably play fewer performances again. I am preparing a monodrama and, with more actors, we plan to prepare a staging with the working title Again. The interview was published in a shortened way in the
daily Sme on the 21st August, 2000. The interviewer was Alexander Balogh.
|