Slovaks are divided into three groups: creators of wealth, destroyers of wealth, and defenceless children and old men.

   In this tractate we only deal with the first two forms, because the third one doesn’t deserve any other care except natural care under time-honoured laws.

   Creators of wealth – small and medium size entrepreneurs and their employees.
This is a group of Slovaks we can’t write much about here. These are people who work, create wealth, and contribute the majority of their work’s results to the state, towns and fire raisers. These are lawless persons, slaves, and vassals. Their right is merely to work and pass on the results of their work. From 1 September 1999, they are people who can be sent to prison at anytime. They are only the breadwinners for the destroyers of wealth and the whole country.

   Destroyers of wealth –
1/ The state and representatives of other forms of the public administration and their employees. These are people paid for from the taxes of the ”taxpayers”, specifically from the taxes taken from small and medium size entrepreneurs and their employees. They are the rules of this country.
2/ State companies and their employees. These are all prosperous organisations that do not pay taxes and live only by the funding they receive from the taxpayers.
3/ Big entrepreneurs in Slovakia are not in fact entrepreneurs. Because the majority of created wealth is owned by the state, only order can be reached by the state. And we know that order can only be achieved by an entrepreneur loyal to the state (i.e. not the most efficient entrepreneur) or an entrepreneur who pays the highest commission to state officers.  These state officers protect this “big” entrepreneur, and he is free from paying most taxes, or simply doesn’t pay taxes or contributions at all. The amount he steals for his benefit, or for the benefit of his officers, will be paid by small and medium size entrepreneurs and his employees.
4/ Mafia groups live from blood and stolen money and their greatest advantage is that they don’t have to pay any taxes at all.

   Normally citizens establish a state to meet the functions that individuals alone cannot manage. The state is the product of the citizen and serves him. It provides what a citizen or civil communities can’t provide. The countries of Europe have not been established naturally. All of them are derived from monarchies with monarchist legislation; in our country this is completed by communist legislation. The monarch was an unlimited ruler. Everything the nation created belonged to him, and he allocated it at his whim. Such is the Slovak state.

   We believe in this illusion. We have all sorts of freedom, and the elections in our country are also held democratically - even Europe has confirmed it. However, we have no democracy here.

   If an entrepreneur shows an annual profit of 20 million Slovak crowns, he has to transfer 16 million of it to the state.
   If an entrepreneur employs a person to realise himself in a human way and to provide for him and his family in order to free the state from paying unemployment benefits and the entrepreneur offers him a wage of 10,000 SKK, the entrepreneur has to pay an equal amount to the state.
   If a citizen of this state is in a situation where his child falls ill and he needs a million crowns for his child’s surgery, he can establish a civil association, a non-profit organisation with one thousand members who pay a membership fee of 1,000 SKK. He has his 1 million crowns. At the same moment, he must deposit 400,000 SKK to pay next year’s tax to the state. He will be left with only 600,000 SKK. And if he pays the wages of the doctors, he will have to pay taxes and other contributions of at least 300,000 SKK.. From the million crowns he collected from association members from taxed money provided for charitable purposes, the citizens of this ”democratic” society pay at least 70% to the state.
Simply: If somebody makes money, he is penalised at an 80% rate, and if somebody allows another person to make money, he will be penalised with a 100% penalty, and if somebody has to care for his family’s health, he is penalised by a penalty of more than 70%. Independence is penalised pursuant to law.

   It makes no sense to enumerate such nonsense. Everybody knows who in our poor country is able to create wealth. This wealth belongs unconditionally with the destroyers of wealth. Only somebody who has never created and has never been able to create wealth can dispose of created wealth.
To label these contributions a tax burden is a cynical euphemism. Openly, we have to say that it is robbery of the citizen, robbery by law. This is definitely something unethical. Logically, destroyers of wealth can’t be called robbers.

   The creators of wealth are good at self-preservation and cannot be liquidated. An entrepreneur who produces an annual profit of 20 million crowns may pay one million of these to skilful lawyers to reduce his tax burden. An entrepreneur who wants to pay his employee ten thousand crowns will make an agreement with him that his wage is 3,600 SKK, and the rest he will receive as black money. In addition, the founder of the association will find other ways to minimise obligatory ”tax contributions”. The creators of wealth are forced to steal illegally. This is something completely unethical.. Can a situation in which the creators of wealth have to pay up to 80% of the wealth they created to somebody else be called a democracy?

I seem to have been speaking about the ”tax burden”, about economic problems. This is not the whole truth. The situation is one in which the creators of wealth are not living in an ethical society. The legislation of the Slovak Republic is UNETHICAL.

   If somebody is allowed to dispose of another’s property and is absolutely sure that he can use and destroy it, he would not feel any liability. And our society has brought people to this.
And here the calls by intellectual people do not help reduce corruption, nor dated impulses, nor speeches by priests in churches or private radios where those stolen from are persuaded not to steal, and Transparency International will remain only a myth, the same way that in naive dreams everything will improve itself in several generations. Nothing will improve itself. Until the state will steal from the most able people (who haven’t yet left the country) until then we will only dream about improvement. Maybe one day we will live like they have lived for ages in other countries.

   Political parties who reward their members by sinecures in the state administration are happy with this situation. They have proved conclusively that they will not help us. Who else? Is it so helpless? Despite a general feeling there are at least two (possibly naive) solutions.
1/ Until now, the United States has come to Europe to stop the murdering. With weapons in their hands, risking their lives to purge the sick of Europe from its own murderers, protecting democratic values. And the stealing of a nation is also contrary to democratic rules and against human rights. Possibly the USA will once again acknowledge that it is time to come armed, ready to rid us of our own robbers and introduce American legislation.
2/ The other non-standard solution, but nevertheless a constitutional one, comes from article 16, part 2 of the Constitution of the Slovak Republic: ”Nobody can be tortured, nor can they be punished in a cruel, inhuman or humiliating way,” and article 32 of the same constitution states: ”Citizens are entitled to stand up against anybody who would remove the democratic order of fundamental human rights and freedoms defined in this constitution if the activity of constitutional bodies and the efficient use of legal means are not possible”.

According to our valid constitution, the creators of wealth are already entitled to reduce the payment of blood money to the state and other parasitic organisation to a necessary 10%; they have the fundamental human right to use the profit for their own benefit and the development of their own creativity, to increase the property that means to increase this republic and all its members. Because nobody else but their creator and NOBODY ELSE is entitled to dispose them. The state administration will have to change its whole concept immediately, liquidate the parasitic forms of its existence and come down to a lower level for the necessary and functional 10%.